Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Fertil Steril ; 18(1): 91-93, 2023 Nov 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38041466

RESUMO

Although intrauterine devices (IUDs) are known for their low failure rate in pregnancy prevention, potential risks associated with their use include uterine perforation and migration through the abdomen. In this particular case, the patient experienced simultaneous IUD failure and perforation, with the device becoming embedded in an omentum. A 28-year-old woman who was 39 weeks plus one day gestation presented for caesarean section. During the caesarean section, it was discovered that the IUD had entered the omentum through a hole in the posterior part of the uterus. The result of the birth was a live boy. IUD perforation is most commonly observed during the insertion procedure; however, it may rarely occur at a later stage. IUD perforations are frequently asymptomatic and remain undetected until follow-up assessments are conducted or clinical manifestations become apparent. The presence of gastrointestinal symptoms is commonly observed in cases with intraperitoneal migration of the IUD. Although the occurrence of abdominal pain, diarrhoea, and fever with a missing IUD are indicative, they may not always be present. Nonspecific signs and symptoms lead to misdiagnosis and the consequent delay in initiating appropriate treatment. In the present case, the co-occurrence of IUD embedded in the omentum and pregnancy posed a challenge due to the device's rapid and imprecise shift, which complicated its accurate localisation. In such scenarios, ultrasonographic guidance can serve as a valuable tool to enhance accuracy and decrease adverse outcomes.

2.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res ; 27(4): 301-307, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36275332

RESUMO

Background: Assessing the progress of labor is a primary step in intrapartum care. This study was performed to assess comparison of the effects of date syrup with saffron-honey syrup on the progress of labor in nulliparous women. Materials and Methods: A randomized single-blind clinical trial study was conducted on 189 women who were referred to Bea'sat Hospital of Sanandaj from October 2019 to March 2020. Patients were randomly divided into three groups saffron-honey syrup, date syrup, and placebo syrup each including 63 cases. Each participant in the intervention and control groups received a maximum volume of 150 ml of saffron-honey syrup, date syrup, or placebo syrup. The syrups were given at the 4 cm dilation, and every 30-60 min until the end of the active phase of the first stage of labor. Data collection tools included a two-part questionnaire and a partograph form. The results were analyzed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 24 using Chi-squared test, analysis of variance, and last significant difference as a post hoc test, the significance level was set at 0.05. Results: The duration of the active phases of the first (F 2 = 92.70, p < 0.01), second (F 2 = 66.76, p < 0.01), and third (F 2 = 12.34, p < 0.01) stages of labor was shorter in the date syrup and saffron-honey syrup groups than in the control group (p < 0.01). Additionally, both experimental groups exhibited no significant difference in terms of duration between the first (p = 0.312), second (p = 0.724), and third (p = 0.911) stages of labor. Conclusions: Date syrup and saffron-honey syrup can be used as one of the safe and available herbal methods to facilitate labor.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...